Legislation Details

Reference No. CB-028-2010    Draft No. 3
Type: Council Bill Status: Enacted
Meeting Body County Council
Meeting Date 7/13/2010
Introduced Date 6/15/2010 Public Hearing Date
Effective date: 9/1/2010    
Title: An Ordinance updating the overall ordinance; clarifying the requirements related to Subtitle 25, Division 2 The Woodland and Wildlife Conservation Ordinance and Subtitle 25, Division 3, The Tree Canopy Coverage Ordinance; adding a process for requesting and evaluating impacts to regulated environmental features; amending submittal requirements; and implementing the recommendations of the Countywide Green Infrastructure Functional Master Plan, approved June 14, 2005.
Proposers/Sponsors: Thomas E. Dernoga, Eric C. Olson, M-NCPPC
Code sections: 27-107.01 - , 27-124.02 - , 27-159 - , 27-179 - , 27-199 - , 27-239.02 - , 27-260 - , 27-272 - , 27-273 - , 27-274 - , 27-276 - , 27-281 - , 27-282 - , 27-285 - , 27-296 - , 27-317 - , 27-518 - , 27-521 - , 27-527 - , 27-528 - , 27-532.02 - , 27-546.05 -
Attachments: 1. ACTION SUMMARY S2010028, 2. B2010028.pdf
Contact: C.J. Lammers M-NCPPC Staff
Title An Ordinance updating the overall ordinance; clarifying the requirements related to Subtitle 25, Division 2 The Woodland and Wildlife Conservation Ordinance and Subtitle 25, Division 3, The Tree Canopy Coverage Ordinance; adding a process for requesting and evaluating impacts to regulated environmental features; amending submittal requirements; and implementing the recommendations of the Countywide Green Infrastructure Functional Master Plan, approved June 14, 2005. Background The related bills include proposed revisions to Subtitles 4, 10, 13, 21, 24, 25, 27 and 30. Division 2 of Subtitle 25-117 is the updated Woodland and Wildlife Habitat Ordinance. 7/13/2010 - After public hearing CB-28-2010 (DR-2) was amended on the floor as follows: Motion to amendment #1 made by Council Member Olson; seconded by Council Member Turner; motion carried 8-0 (Absent: Council Member Exum) On page 18; line 6 add: SECTION 3. BE IT FURTHER ENACTED that a development project for which all required development applications have been approved by the Planning Board, Zoning Hearing Examiner, or District Council, and appeal periods have not expired, is grandfathered; or a development project that has an approved preliminary plan of subdivision, but has not completed subsequent processes such as final plat or site plan, is grandfathered for that portion of the project covered by the preliminary plan.