Legislation Details

Reference No. CR-078-2025    Draft No. 1
Type: Resolution Status: Failed
Meeting Body Health, Human Services and Public Safety Committee
Meeting Date 6/17/2025
Introduced Date Public Hearing Date
Effective date:    
Title: A RESOLUTION CONCERNING JUDICIAL TRAINING ON CHILD CUSTODY CASES INVOLVING CHILD ABUSE OR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE for the purpose of urging judges and magistrates who preside over child custody cases in Prince George’s County courts to regularly review and ensure compliance with the latest training programs regarding child custody cases involving child abuse or domestic violence offered by the Judicial College of Maryland and relevant state initiatives, pursuant to the Annotated Code of Maryland, Family Law Article Section 9-101.3 and emphasizing the critical importance of continuing education in these matters.
Proposers/Sponsors: Calvin S. Hawkins, Edward P. Burroughs, Wala Blegay, Ingrid S. Watson, Thomas E. Dernoga, Jolene Ivey, Shayla Adams-Stafford, Eric C. Olson, Sydney J. Harrison
Attachments: 1. R2025078, 2. CR-078-2025 Summary, 3. CR-078 2025 Withdrawal
Contact: Ramon Gonzalez, Legislative Attorney

Title

A RESOLUTION CONCERNING JUDICIAL TRAINING ON CHILD CUSTODY CASES INVOLVING CHILD ABUSE OR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE for the purpose of urging judges and magistrates who preside over child custody cases in Prince George’s County courts to regularly review and ensure compliance with the latest training programs regarding child custody cases involving child abuse or domestic violence offered by the Judicial College of Maryland and relevant state initiatives, pursuant to the Annotated Code of Maryland, Family Law Article Section 9-101.3 and emphasizing the critical importance of continuing education in these matters.

 

Background

This resolution urges ongoing compliance with judicial training requirements under Maryland Law which mandates specialized education for judges and magistrates who preside over child custody cases involving child abuse or domestic violence. This resolution emphasizes the importance of continuing education to ensure that judicial officers remain current on the complexities and best practices in these sensitive matters. It also calls for the distribution of the resolution to key court administrators to reinforce institutional accountability and awareness of these critical matters.